US Waiver

Page 4 of 13 · Back to the first post

jazzsax (trusted member) Trusted

In my case the incident was in 2009, we tried to sort it out civilly in 2013 but our lawyers couldn't come to a settlement so the regulator got involved and I got charged in early 2015. Plead in 2015 (quick resolution) and now sentence is over and in probation.

I agree the longer I wait the better the chances. Just trying to work out what all we can show towards rehabilitation other than all the obvious. Way ahead of any requirements on restitution (the mandated part as part of sentence and probation is actually done, and now working on the stand alone order. I had a fixed monthly amount to pay during sentence / probation).

I know it's a crapshoot. Just trying to think of all the things I can put together to help show rehabilitation.

JOHN ROGERS (trusted member) Trusted

@jazzsax a mitigating factor in your situation is that the length of time can be explained as "longer than it looks" because of the length of time it took to get resolved. That's not usual for most people. I think your chances are good. Obviously we would highlight the 9 years since the incident.

K SCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

#59 you are right when you say trade secrets. Rehabilitation is indeed one big factor and it has to be tailored to the individual. Passage of time is not necessarily accurate since they can deny a waiver at any point in time on a case...regardless of how much time has passed. Btw...I do not know who said the reference letters are not important but that is not correct. If they were not important then CBP would not ask about them. Discount Waiver Companies do not understand this and this one reason why there is so much bad information out there. They do not understand the immigration codes, policies, procedures or how CBP operates internally. As a result, you get the questions here on the forum. U.S. immigration law, in general, is very complicated and even a lot of lawyers in the field do not know what they are doing. Luckily, I have had the opportunity to attend immigration law conferences so I had the opportunity to learn some things that they don't put out in public or on the CBP site.

An example is that they are denying waivers on sex crimes that were committed 10 to 30 years ago. Plenty of time has passed but they were still denied. Also, a lot of these people had been previously approved. There are many factors that go into the ARO processing waiver cases and CBP uses many things to render a decision.

Btw yes you can indeed apply early but just be aware that can be harsh at times. The one good thing though is that it is a Fraud offence and not Trafficking or a Sex Crime. I don't mean you, but people need to understand that they are at the mercy of CBP when they are applying for these waivers. They will take as long as they see fit and absolutely no one on Earth can speed the adjudicating officer up.

Regarding rehabilitation in your case...You can always give me a shout at 1 888 908-3841 or 604 332-9213 and we can discuss your specific rehabilitation.

usentrywaiverservices.com

jazzsax (trusted member) Trusted

Thanks Ken. Yes, I'm aware we are at the mercy. Doing what I can in advance to build a strong case.

JOHN ROGERS (trusted member) Trusted

@K Scott. You need to stop using that term. I know it furthers your "agenda" but there are few Waiver companies, and there are no "discount waiver companies". There are pardon companies that do waivers, and some of these are very sloppy.

MIchelle and I both run pardon and waiver companies, we both are accredited for fingerprinting, and we charge a fee that in line with our competitors. Its fair compensation for what we do, in our view.

Your fees are well above the industry standard, and in fact you charge what lawyers charge, but are not a lawyer. Thats doesn't make you better or worse at what you do, its the price point you have chosen.

Your insulting both Michelle and I when you use that term, and I am asking that you stop it. It chips away at your credibility when you use "trump-like" sound bites.

If you must, use crappy pardon companies. Or unethical pardon companies. That's what you are really talking about.

K SCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

Well, actually no John..it has nothing to do to "further" my agenda...whatever agenda that you may think that I have. I call it as I see it. The majority of mistakes that I see in packages come from companies charging $399 or so for waivers. I could use the term low-cost waiver companies but it would be the same thing. Rarely do I see mistakes from big law firms in Seattle that are charging $4500 for a waiver.

You may personally object to the term but I have no control over this. I never ever mentioned you or Michelle and I have said multiple times that none of the 3 of us fall into this category. If I thought that the term applied to you then I would not beat around the bush and would have just come out and said it. You know my personality and that I do not hold back on words or anything...Whether it is with clients or my personal life. This same tenacity we apply in preparing these border crossing cases.

Again, there is no intent to insult anyone and my credibility is not an issue since we are very well known in a positive way in the lower mainland of BC. So I will say again what I have said before...People are allowed to charge whatever they choose to charge. People will pay if they see the value in what we offer and if we can help them. We are going to be charging $2500-$4500 to get these PPT cases approved..whether it is a denial or a first time. No one is forced to pay these rates but people here in BC do.

So I will continue to use the DWC term since again it seems to be the companies in this range that tend to keep ripping these people off or doing shoddy work. One thing I can say though is that we got a waiver client that went to a Vancouver BC lawyer and he did shoddy work. I believe that he charged around $2500 and really messed up this case.

K SCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

#64 Yes Jazzsax you seem to know how this stuff works. The burden of proof is on the alien to prove that they are admissible to the USA. CBP can turn a person around for many things besides criminality. They can also deport a non-citizen for many things as well. Btw this can even include a person holding a Green Card. I am really passionate about resolving these border cases and also look to the person's future in this sense.

An example is that we had a guy that went to a Discount Waiver Company and they tried to charge him to do a waiver for his convictions. He had a few dui offences, firearm offences, and more. We told him that he did not even have to apply for a waiver. We then turned him over to one of our lawyer associates so that she could do his Green card application since he married a USA citizen. I explained to him that if he applied for a waiver and got approved, that it could impact him obtaining a Greencard through family sponsorship. Having a previously issued Non-immigrant waiver can have an impact when applying for a family sponsorship.

On June 6, we sent another waiver client to our associate since he might qualify for a USA passport based upon his father. If she says that he qualifies(which he does), then he does not need to do a waiver again. I asked him why did he not do this before and he said that the waiver company mistakenly told him that he needed a waiver. We only made $600 so far on this case but I am happy knowing that he won't have to do this process again. These are the people that are good for sending referrals.

I have a good buddy now that has to get a hardship waiver because he is being sponsored by his USA citizen wife. We did his waiver and he has a conviction for Possession of a Narcotic. The Chicago lawyer has charged him $8,000 to prepare the waiver but he will get approved for a Green Card.

JOHN ROGERS (trusted member) Trusted

Why didn't he simply wait for the green card application to get to the point where he would need to file an I-601 and never have to file a waiver?

Was the $8000 for a waiver or a green card application?

He's a real lawyer of a faux lawyer like yourself?

K SCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

Well Brotha John I gotta tell ya.... If a person has an offence that requires a non-immigrant waiver....and a USA citizen tries to sponsor them....then that person will need an I-601 waiver anyway since the waiver has been issued because CBP deemed that the person is inadmissible. Btw CBP is not always correct. So the passage of time would be irrelevant if a person has an offence that makes them inadmissible to the USA. It would not matter if they waited 3 or 300 years.

Plus he got the waiver back in 2006 and he got married in 2017 anyway. So it would not really matter in his case because he has a CBP history. The $8000 fee was for both the 601 and the Green Card application. This is the reason why we try to get the September Letters for people if they qualify...so they won't have to go through this nonsense in the future. It will save them a lot of money. I just wish that I could have gotten one for my buddy and saved him the money.

Again, this is the reason why I am so hard on some of these lawyers and Discount Waiver Companies because they are costing these people a lot of money and headache. If there is something that I cannot do, then I refer them out to a person that can help them.

jazzsax (trusted member) Trusted

Question on court records.

If we provide the "certified court records" as part of the application, what is included in those records? Is it just a copy of the information / disposition and any sentence orders? Or is it massive detail?

Curious what gets sent, and curious how that impacts the waiver applications

Michelle (trusted member) Trusted

@Jazzsax #70..certified court records, has a large range of information. In Regina, Saskatchewan, court document is usually a 2 to 3 page document showing original charge, court dates, fines or restitution paid, probation orders, outstanding warrants that may have been issued in relation to the criminal record and finally the disposition or sentence given. Some of the other courthouses do not include so much information. Sometimes, a court document cannot be located, so the court house here issues a letter stating this which is acceptable. For the most part these documents are all that is required. Now, when I am dealing with more serious cases, such as Sexual Assaults, Attempted Murder, Ect. I request Court Transcripts, these are the recordings of the court proceedings..these documents are very detailed about the crime, the victim and the subject. They are extremely sensitive and confidential. I request these for the more serious cases that I know are going to be a problem and they are expensive, usually about $1 per page and can run up to several hundred dollars...

jazzsax (trusted member) Trusted

Ok, so by the sounds of it, it sounds like the information, disposition and copies of any orders. That seems reasonable.

JOHN ROGERS (trusted member) Trusted

As usual, Michelle hits the nail on the head. Its rare court TRANSCRIPTS are needed. Court Documents are great but they actually don't show much useful information. Even an attempt to get them is sufficient in most cases.

Michelle (trusted member) Trusted

@70 Jazzsax, Additional to my comment #71...Court documents must be provided in Application package here in Saskatchewan, otherwise, the application will be refused by the US Custom Borders around here. I cannot speak for other provinces. I have also had requests for court transcripts when applications are under review.

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

i am posting this because they do mention waivers.

“Waiver applications submitted with little to no supporting evidence; or”

USCIS Updates Policy Guidance for Certain Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny

WASHINGTON - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today posted a policy memorandum (PDF, 113 KB) (PM) that provides guidance to USCIS adjudicators regarding their discretion to deny an application, petition, or request without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) when required initial evidence was not submitted or the evidence of record fails to establish eligibility.
This updated guidance is effective September 11, 2018 and applies to all applications, petitions, and requests, except for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) adjudications, received after that date. Due to preliminary injunctions issued by courts in California and New York, this new PM does not change the RFE and NOID policies and practices that apply to the adjudication of DACA requests.
“For too long, our immigration system has been bogged down with frivolous or meritless claims that slow down processing for everyone, including legitimate petitioners. Through this long overdue policy change, USCIS is restoring full discretion to our immigration officers to deny incomplete and ineligible applications and petitions submitted for immigration benefits,” said USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna. “Doing so will discourage frivolous filings and skeletal applications used to game the system, ensure our resources are not wasted, and ultimately improve our agency’s ability to efficiently and fairly adjudicate requests for immigration benefits in full accordance with our laws.”
The 2013 PM addressed policies for the issuance of RFEs and NOIDs when the evidence submitted at the time of filing did not establish eligibility. In practice, the 2013 PM limited denials without RFEs or NOIDs to statutory denials by providing that RFEs should be issued unless there was “no possibility” of approval. This “no possibility” policy limited the application of an adjudicator’s discretion.
The policy implemented in this guidance restores to the adjudicator full discretion to deny applications, petitions, and requests without first issuing an RFE or a NOID, when appropriate. This policy is intended to discourage frivolous or substantially incomplete filings used as “placeholder” filings and encourage applicants, petitioners, and requestors to be diligent in collecting and submitting required evidence.
USCIS will continue issuing statutory denials when appropriate without first issuing an RFE or NOID when the applicant, petitioner, or requestor has no legal basis for the benefit/request sought, or submits a request for a benefit or relief under a program that has been terminated.
If all required initial evidence is not submitted with the benefit request, USCIS, in its discretion, may deny the benefit request for failure to establish eligibility based on lack of required initial evidence. Examples of filings that may be denied without sending an RFE or NOID include, but are not limited to:
• Waiver applications submitted with little to no supporting evidence; or
• Cases where the regulations, the statute, or form instructions require the submission of an official document or other form of evidence establishing eligibility at the time of filing and there is no such submission. For example, an Affidavit of Support (Form I-864), if required, was not submitted with an Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485).
This PM updates Chapters 10.5(a) and 10.5(b) of the USCIS Adjudicator’s Field Manual and contains an “additional considerations” section. The policy in this “additional considerations” section is not new, and is nearly identical to the policy contained in the superseded 2013 PM.
For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on Twitter (@uscis), Instagram (/uscis), YouTube (/uscis), and Facebook (/uscis).

jazzsax (trusted member) Trusted

Sounds like alot of people submit wimpy packets then...

ECDboy

K Scott. You are a scum. Look at your picture in Facebook. You look like you just came out of prison.
Charging $5000 a case for drugs? Only doing that because 90% of cases from surrey are drugs.

Also, since you're doing HUGE cases with people from UK. Why the fuck would someone from the other side of the world call a waiver company in Surrey, BC with zero credibility? Why? Makes zero sense.

K SCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

ECD/Down Syndrome Boy..You talk a lot of smack online behind a square box. Why don't you come meet my Surrey, Abbotsford and East Van associates and have this conversation politely? I am sure that you will walk out in 1 piece. Btw have a nice big fuck you and a nice day. :)

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

We have done quite a few Port Paroles, and we had an interesting one that even we were surprised was granted today.

The client is going to a hockey "fantasy camp" where alumni and players play and socialize. The client had a waiver that expired in May and the Camp is in a weeks time. (August 2018) He had applied and the waiver was still pending just over 90 days.

He got approved! We were pleasantly surprised and the client was obviously thrilled. He had committed a lot of money to the fantasy camp experience.

Interesting fact, we only sent the Parole Request yesterday. Approved today. He was granted 6 days.

Generally we had gotten these before for funerals and people with relatives on their deathbed, and we had recently gotten a cancer patient who we were able to get 4 consecutive Paroles while he waited for his first ever waiver. The treatments worked and it looks like the Paroles saved his life. He now has a waiver.

I cannot say if this is an "exception" or a sign they are being more lenient. Need more data. This was done through Buffalo.

jazzsax1 (trusted member) Trusted

Interesting. I had heard those were insanely hard to get. Makes me wonder if they are willing to look more at these on business cases since they would be for defined times (ie, specific length of trip) instead of wide open like a waiver?

Isn't the port parole at the discretion of the actual port of entry?

Reply

Formatting: **bold**, *italic*, > quote, - list, [link text](https://…)

No email, no registration. Pick a name and a password, write them down, and use the same pair every time. Forgot your password?