Once waiver is received

Page 3 of 4 · Back to the first post

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

(More politics everyone)

Alberta was lucky enough to live on a lake of oil. Now that oil prices are in the toilet, we are realizing that oil companies raped that province and the Conservative governments helped.

This is the sad reality that has Albertans upset. It had nothing to do with some "work ethic" or some philosophy. Oil prices up...we are rich. We are a have. Oil prices down...we are a have not. And now Alberta realizes the reality of not being rich. The reality of what the Conservatives DID to them. And now they are blaming the NDP. It literally like blaming the new boyfriend for the beating the old one gave you.

But no lesson was learned. They think a pipeline will solve all their problems, but in reality when OPEC closes the tap enough and prices rise, they will be rich again and Conservatives will spread the provinces legs again and.....see you here again in a few years.

The one thing I never realized is how whiny Albertans truly are. Quebec has a different issue because remember the rich anglo minority always had power there. The franco majority always felt that they were left out. This led to a lot of the disputes.

Alberta has no such excuse.

jazzsax1 (trusted member) Trusted

Oh John, you're living in the GTA bubble of "we're always right and the rest of you are wrong"

When Alberta is prosperous, the nation prospers. End of story. The amount of tax outflows via transfers is enormous, both on the corporate side and the personal side. What do you think allows provinces like Quebec to fund all their special programs that everyone else would die to have? Equalization.

Alberta has 11.6% of the population of Canada, but contributes far more to GDP than every other province except Ontario. And even per Capita, we crush all other provinces, even in a DOWN year. 2017 we had $78K per person GDP contribution, Ontario was 55K. You may have 3.5x more people in Ontario, but your GDP contribution is only 2x Alberta. Lag much?

You can brag about tech, you can brag about banking, you can brag about Auto and other industries (hydro, LOL), but reality is we fund the bulk of the country.

We argue for pipelines primarily to assist in the disparity. Quebec causes more pollution allowing tankers to come in to the seaway and buying oil from Saudi Arabia than it would with a pipeline. BC causes far more pollution with cruiseliner traffic in a single day than the increase of tanker traffic would cause in a year.

Equalisation is simply a political program, not an economic one. If the numbers were revised *fairly*, transfers would not be the same. Quebec would not have $5 a day day care, the lowest university tuition in canada, etc, etc.

Oil companies just like every other company out there (all the big banks, lenders, and everyone else) operate to make a profit. They haven't raped shit, they've run businesses that employ people and feed the desperate need of canadian consumerism. Money is leaving the province because of stupid decisions made by the present government to discourage investment. You know how money works, it moves to where it sees the potential for the best return. Create a climate for investment, money comes in. Make it difficult, money moves out.

If ontarians actually took the time to read monetary reports, study economics, learn how the world really works you would understand why Albertans (and to an extend those from Saskatchewan) get so upset. We work hard, but we play hard. Our wealth isn't fake created from rising housing prices (caused partially by poor liberal monetary policy decisions with inflation in the 90's), it's created from a functioning economy that fuels so many subsectors it's not even funny.

I've lived in both provinces. I've seen people from all sides, I'm not going to spout that I'm an expert but I think I have a far better pulse to the ground than someone living in a bubble in Toronto. :)

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

I understand how the world works. I live in Brampton, not Toronto.

You view the world with a Conservative eye where corporations are nothing but good.

But that doesn't mean I am right and you are wrong. Agree to disagree.

jazzsax1 (trusted member) Trusted

I didn't suggest they are nothing but good. Ever seen how banks operate? LOL!

You view the world with a Liberal eye which says "Alberta is Evil". Started with Poppa Trudeau and his son has carried the torch....

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

When I was growing up Alberta was Joe Clark Conservative and we had no problem with them. We were all focused on Quebec. The referendum ect. Mulroney, Clark, these were Conservative minded politicians who I did not support, but I also didn't fear.

Harper I knew would be a different animal, and I was completely right.

When the Conservatives followed the Republican Party is where the division happened. I would say when the "University Of Calgary" group realized the politics of division and hatred worked, and started to implement it, the real division happened.

Michelle (trusted member) Trusted

John and Ken, a question for you both...have either of you crossed into the USA for travel or work and stopped or questioned about your company? I ask, because different clients have advised me when they drop off paperwork, a Custom Officer will comment about FPS saying yes, we are familiar with this company and its owner and they have are in good standing with us..I find this interesting.. I have not crossed into the USA since starting the company. I know when I was with Police my passport had my police identification attached to it in the computer and I never had any problems. Even when I tried boarding with a wine corkscrew in my purse..(but that is another story..LOL..)....I think we might have to take a little vacation and see what happens...

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

My Colleague from Montreal, Manni Jason and I were once both questioned about our jobs years ago, but mostly out of curiosity.

I have traveled maybe 5 or 6 times to the United States, especially when I was competing in tournaments or fights in Ohio. It never really came up. They see the cauliflower ears and fighting seems to become the main topic.

I would chat here and there with Homeland Security at Pearson Airport when it was open, and they would even send people back out to see me when they were too exasperated to explain what the people needed to apply.

Since your crossing at a smaller border, maybe they are more friendly and have the time to chat? That's probably a bigger factor than anything else.

Adelaide (trusted member) Trusted

Question for the anyone with any knowledge of this:

Is it possible to get a green card if you marry an American but you still are banned or do you have to wait until the ban is COMPLETELY over before you can get a green card?

For example - if you have a ten year ban for an overstay and you're 4-5 years into the ban and you marry an American citizen how does that affect the possibility of getting a waiver and a green card?

WaiveMeIn

If it's an overstay ban, then I believe you can file I-601 then apply for a green card. If it's a criminal record, then it would depend on what kind of crime was it. I believe some crimes would make you ineligible for green card forever and cannot be waived. Maybe experts can comment?

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

I have done K-1 visas with a long ban in place, but never a visa where you are already married. No matter what you are filing, if you are inadmissible, you will be asked to file an I-601 at some point to "waiver" your inadmissibility.

The K-1 visa is the "Fiance visa" and in a real relationship, a fairly easy visa to get. I have no done one since Trump was in power though, so I cannot give definitive advice as to whether it would work with an existing ban.

Adelaide (trusted member) Trusted

#50- @WaiveMein

Thanks for your input. :)

#51 - @John Rogers

I am not already married. I have a 10 year ban for an overstay... (no criminal record whatsoever)

If I file an I-601 this year (I'm currently 4 1/2 years into my ban) how is that different from a "regular" waiver or are they the same thing?

Is filing an I-601 a better option for me and do I have to wait the ENTIRE 10 years before they would even consider processing a green card application?

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@Adelaide

You don't simply file an i-601.

You file your regular application for the green card. If you are a Fiance, then a K-1. If you get married a spousal application. Homeland Security will ask you for the I-601 in the latter part of the application.

jazzsax1 (trusted member) Trusted

Hey John,

Any noticed change lately in responses on waivers that were in the queue before the shutdown? Longer waivers? Shorter? Same?

Any trends developing?

Adelaide (trusted member) Trusted

#53 - John Rogers

Thanks for the reply as usual :)

One other question from the before: Does one have to wait the ENTIRE 10 years until the overstay ban is over before one is eligible to file a green card application?

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@Adelaide I am not 100% sure. I don't do enough work in that area to give a definite answer.

@Jazzsax1 only 3 clients have gotten a reply post shutdown.

-one was a rejection (expected) because not enough time had elapsed since exclusion

-one was granted, filed February 6 granted Feb 19. Just a one year but he had been rejected in the past and has a serious record. No idea why it was so fast

-One client got a letter dated Feb 19 also, but it was to close his file because he never responded in the 87 days. Claims he never got the letter asking for more information and filed his waiver in September.

That is all the information I have post shut down to date.

Adelaide (trusted member) Trusted

#56 - John Rogers
Thank you for your answer and being humble enough to state that you are not "100% sure". That speaks to your integrity.

For first time waiver applicants what are the chances of me (in your estimation and knowledge of these things) getting a ONE year waiver versus a FIVE year waiver for an overstay (and applying for said waiver basically being half-way through a 10 year ban)?

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@Adelaide I appreciate the comment. I consider myself an experts in some areas, but I try to be cautious where I am not.

Since it has been 5 years, I think you have an equal chance of getting a 5 or a 1 to be honest. My concern is that they possibly ask you for an I-212 and you will have to play $930 on top of the $585 if they do.

There is also a possibility they may say no and make you wait out your ban, although I don't think so.

Adelaide (trusted member) Trusted

#58 - @John Rogers

Why would they ask for an I-212? I was neither deported nor removed from the US. I left and was denied admission when I tried to fly back in. In fact I had travelled back and forth 2-3 times when I had an overstay and apparently it wasn't flagged in their computer nor did they stop me or put me into Secondary.

Is a I-212 something they slap on to the regular waiver when they just feel like being extra-punitive? I'm not quite sure why a "regular waiver" (the $585 one) would not be sufficient.

And making me wait out the entire 10 year ban is that because of the Trump administration? Have you had clients have to wait out the ENITRE ban because of an overstay?

Other than an overstay I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Can you clarify? Thanks

Reply

Formatting: **bold**, *italic*, > quote, - list, [link text](https://…)

No email, no registration. Pick a name and a password, write them down, and use the same pair every time. Forgot your password?