Remove A Repealed Offence From Your RCMP Report

Page 2 of 2 · Back to the first post

KSCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

@ Michelle you are 100% correct but we are going for the Lifetime Clearance for this person. Sex Assault convictions are major work and we still accept them. I cannot speak for others, but we have had success getting them cleared. This includes if the victim is under 18 BUT...the amount of rehabilitation and remorse is staggering, and that is on a small offence sex assault case. We currently have people now doing their rehab since I checked in on yesterday.

We have an extraordinarily complex case now where a former female babysitter has molestation convictions. I told her she has a 20% chance of success, but she still wants to try and is doing her rehabilitation. This is even more complex since she previously held a position of public trust. I cannot go into any further details at this point.

We can easily charge minimum $5,000 - $15,000 on these cases now and some people will indeed pay it. They do have to be extremely dedicated to sticking this process out though. I even joke with them that they will get gray hair from us and cringe when they see our number on their call display. I say this because we constantly check up on them and the progress regarding their case processing.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332-9213

Michelle (trusted member) Trusted

@Ken, interesting you brought up this "repealed", I had no experience with it until today. And yes, I am going to call out Federal Pardons..Note: This is referring to a Pardon, not a Waiver application. Mr. X attended my office for Pardon prints, because he hired Federal Pardons. He asked me if I know anything about Pardons, and I said sure, what do you need to know? Mr. X starts with " Well I have this conviction from 2001 that was repealed and Federal Pardons told me I am eligible for a Pardon - no problem." So I asked what the charge was, and he tells me Sec. 154. and he received 3 years jail..Well, whenever I hear 3 years jail, I am thinking, hmmm, not such an easy Pardon...and I am not familiar with Sec. 154. So, I go to my bookcase of Law books, and search 154..and find that it has been repealed and now is Sec. 151. involving a minor (under 16)...I am very familiar with Sec. 151, and the chances of obtaining a Pardon for this is slim to none. So I advise Mr. X, that if he was my client "I would say no, you are not going to get a Pardon, and if you do, it is going to cost a lot of money and time...and there is definitely no guarantee. I printed him out information from the Parole Board and told him to call Federal and ask for a written Guarantee or a refund to his $1500..So based on this I think Repealed just means a change in the criminal code section or meaning and upgraded to another sec. # or wording...I would like to see his criminal record to see how it listed. But I don't think he will be back.

J Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@Michelle its a scam to get him to apply.

Just like the client the other day who was solicited by Pardons Canada to "destroy" his records now that his pardon is already granted. These companies who misrepresent services are committing Fraud. This is NO different than any other fraud. They should be charge criminally.

KSCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

@Michelle Yes you are 100% correct since the statute number and possibly the wording has been changed. Btw I am impressed and admire how you told him to demand the 100% guarantee from the Discount Waiver Company. This is why I always say that you will never rip off anyone and we always back you. I have told people like him that there is an extremely high degree of probability (aka 98.6% chance) that they will get denied for a pardon.

I do not mean to beat a dead horse, but we get this from certain clients that have been taken by these Ontario cheap waiver companies. An example is that we just got a client that got ripped off by one that offered to sell her a “waiver kit.” She does not need a waiver and essentially has a lifetime clearance but would have talked herself into a Misrepresentation offence had she used this “kit.”

Hence, this means that she would then need to get a waiver for the rest of her life. I told her to ask the DWC if she even needed a waiver and they said they were unsure. We told her to ask for a refund, and that she could mention my name. Well the DWC clerk got mad and apparently referred to me, using very choice words Lol... They ended up offering her a 50% refund and she took it.

Btw no offence about the horse analogy since I know you love your horses...lol

We sometimes have to offer the 100% refund option to a client as a show of good faith if they have been previously ripped off by an Ontario Discount Waiver Company. I understand where they are coming from though since they got ripped off for $659.08 by Batman’s Pardon & Waivers in Toronto.

You have also brought up a topic that I was going to contact you about. There is a way that you can make extra money by contracting out your special talents to law firms by being an “Analytical Recommendatory Opinion Expert."

It will be easier for you because firms are always looking to contract out certain things to specialists in certain areas. Your prior employment clearly puts you into that category. I do the same thing now with firms on special cases because of my background. I even often submit my own Analytical Recommendatory Opinion on certain waiver cases, and it seems to work.

The thing is that you have to possess the special law background based on previously working for the government or for/with law firms. You can bill them at $100hr and take as long as necessary to prepare the document(s). The firm will just add your fee to the client’s bill as a disbursement. It is all just in the wording that you use to document your "analytical opinion." I can share with you a sample of what we submit.

They will not contract out this service to employees of Discount Waiver Companies since they have often never received any special legal training, and there is no distinction between them and Joe the Plumber filling out a waiver application. I would be happy to show you a lot of these things and it will allow you to demand a higher fee from clients.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332--9213

J Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@KenScott

Show me anything that says this statement is true.


you must possess the special law background based on previously working for the government or for/with law firms.

Now show us some cheques or proof of payment from a single law firm who paid you for this. Law firms are VERY specific in how they bill/pay invoices, and we KNOW you paid taxes on it. Let us see. Remember, its easy to verify, we can just call the Law Firms. Should be a ton to choose from.

Cue excuses. (remember, you put this out there, I am just asking you to prove it)

J Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@KenScott

You made a statement to promote your business. I am skeptical that it is true. You should WANT to prove you are being accurate.

The problem is you are CONSTANTLY making these "announcements". I know why. Because you are getting absolutely NO business. Like Trump portraying "health" despite being sick, you are maintaining a façade. Its not your fault, other than not doing pardons or fingerprints has left you in a tough spot. I sympathize.

RCMP accreditation goes like this. One person is the "point of contact" officer. That is Jennifer because when we first did fingerprints, she would travel to see clients. We had a large amount of social services clients, and she would go to their homes. We have myself and another staff member (Wendi) accredited "under" her. We rarely ever take our machine out of office.

Jennifer, mother of 3, would go into the toughest parts of Toronto, with $10 000 worth of equipment, alone. 4 appointments a day.
Ken, supposed part Ninja, is scared to meet clients face to face, so keeps his "office(s)" locations secret.

Do you see how this makes no sense? "Dangerous people" are not going to get a waiver. I know your trying to build "mystique" but it doesn't come off as "real". It is ok to admit that you don't have enough business to justify an office. It doesn't make you less qualified, it just makes your business "different".

KSCOTT (trusted member) Trusted

Your thoughts/feelings are unquestionably irrelevant, and we will not engage with you here on frivolous topics. You can engage here but you will be doing it by yourself. Your may only engage with us on our live on-air show. Again, you know absolutely nothing about us and now you have rendered the forum impotent...which is a topic you are intimately familiar with.

So, I will be the man here and cease frivolous engagement with you. I will post the link on the forum and people can click on and listen to the live on-air show. Me and my Surrey Manager will be discussing some of our cases and other topics of interest for people. The purpose of this episode will be both informative and entertaining. You will have maybe a 20-minute segment where you can voice your grievances with us if you have the courage. No need to hide behind the keyboard anymore.

We still cannot fully figure out why you are so interested in us since we could not care any less about you.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332-9213

J Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@KenScott

I bet you cut the segment off pretty quickly. No way it goes 20 minutes if I am on live. If its just a recorded segment, well that is a waste of time since you can edit it.

I am game.

Reply

Formatting: **bold**, *italic*, > quote, - list, [link text](https://…)

No email, no registration. Pick a name and a password, write them down, and use the same pair every time. Forgot your password?