Question about record suspensions

Page 2 of 3 · Back to the first post

HatsBootsHatsBoots (trusted member) Trusted

@Nicknack

Correct, once you are granted a pardon and you have your fingerprints done, the information shown will indicate *no record found*. A pardoned record search can be obtained through the privacy act and will indicate that you received a pardon. You can request a vulnerable persons check at the arresting police force. This will show all your negative police interactions. Vulnerable record checks are hard to obtain. Most police forces will object unless you provide them with sufficient information that you are applying to work with vulnerable people, ex: children and seniors.

For the FPS number, there is no true way to obtain that information. The only way to destroy it is through a file destruction. Remember though, once you obtain a pardon your FPS number, in principle, will get removed.

The only way to be safe is to get a file destruction which the local police force might object to. Each police agencies have their own rules. There is no legislation for file destructions. For minor charges like weed possession, stealing or vandalism, they will likely grant it.

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@Nicknack

A couple of things.

1. "John Rogers ." is not me. Its HatsBootsHatsBoots on a fake profile.

2. I charge $650 which includes taxes and Fingerprints (listed on my website) not what was listed here.

Just do fingerprints after your Pardon/Record Suspension. (Pardon if you are an Ontario or BC resident and were convicted before March 2012, Record Suspension otherwise) The check will come back "no record existing". You are then clear. Beware of misinformation to make you feel vulnerable. If pardons were suddenly ineffective I would have so many former pardon clients needing waivers I could retire a very rich man. It hasn't happened yet.

This story is full of inaccuracies.

This could not be further from the truth;

"“There are a number of dated convictions, probably on paper, that will predate the current operating system used and were dormant in a filing cabinet somewhere. As soon as that gets updated … it goes from invisible to visible because previously there would have been no entry.”

Saunders says the issue has been common knowledge on the U.S. side for a long time.

“They told me that years ago they would laugh and say ‘Someone gets a pardon, they think they’re so smart,’ that it hides the record. But it actually reveals it. All that a pardon does it that it seals your court records. It’s still on CPIC.”

The people who perpetuate this are usually Homeland Security, who hates Pardons, and Immigration Lawyers, who want you to avoid pardons and keep doing Waivers.

HatsBootsHatsBoots does not know what he is talking about, so please ignore his advice.

“You can request a vulnerable persons check at the arresting police force. This will show all your negative police interactions. Vulnerable record checks are hard to obtain. Most police forces will object unless you provide them with sufficient information that you are applying to work with vulnerable people, ex: children and seniors.”

Totally incorrect. A vulnerable sector check is done when you are going to work with vulnerable persons. To obtain one you simply need a request form the agency that is going to have you work/volunteer for them. Michelle can back me up on this. So could a simple search of any police website on the internet.

This is also partially misleading;

“For the FPS number, there is no true way to obtain that information. The only way to destroy it is through a file destruction. Remember though, once you obtain a pardon your FPS number, in principle, will get removed.

The only way to be safe is to get a file destruction which the local police force might object to. Each police agencies have their own rules. There is no legislation for file destructions. For minor charges like weed possession, stealing or vandalism, they will likely grant it.”

A file destruction ONLY applies if you were NOT convicted. You cannot do this if you get a pardon. The record is only SEALED, and will be unsealed if the person is re-convicted.

This is ridiculous;

“If you still have questions, a certain John Rogers will surely try to defend himself by calling me illiterate or stupid.”

I have never said either of those things about HATS. Simply put, he is a guy who likes to portray himself as an expert because he did a waiver for his girlfriend once, and has internet access. Sometimes his answers are accurate, if a bit long winded and full of moralizing. Sometimes his answers are incorrect. I can't sit here and let him mislead people just because he is the "Cliff Claven" of this forum.

Its a bit ridiculous of him to feel morally superior because my JOB is waivers, and his HOBBY is waivers. Michelle and I are both experts because we do this for a living and we do fingerprints for many different applications, not just pardons and waiver. Michelle has also done work in which she had access to CPIC so her insights on the topic come from experience, not idle speculation.

@HatsBootsHatsBoots a few of us that are regulars are pretty sure your the Bomba guy and the one putting up fake profiles. Please refrain.

John Rogers (trusted member) Trusted

@HatsBootHatsBootsHats

You cannot seriously think what we wrote was the same thing. If you were "thinking" what I said but wrote what you wrote...they are not the same.

Please stop the antics. I don't mean your long winded answers, I mean the other stuff. People are missing questions because you are posting fake profiles, so just agree to disagree, and people can decide which advice they would like to follow.

HatsBootsHatsBoots (trusted member) Trusted

@John Rogers

I didn't use fake profiles. All I do is come here time to time. I have continuously stated this in my past interactions. I refrain from posting because you have taken over. Nobody over here can dethrone you. You and Ken Scott were having a blast going at each other that you lost all respect. When Ken Scott finally called it quits, you had the clear path. You must feel empowered having your own little kingdom on the Web.

You have to admit that you are like a used car salesman. You claim you are an expert but when the real questions are thrown at you, you don't really have an answer. You ask for Michelle. You both work together to siphon up potential customers. You are running a good show together. I am a threat to you and everyone will agree. Newcomers who truly need help have no other alternatives other than you two.

Here's something that people don't appreciate. My knowledge may be different than yours. Saying to the people that you are correcting and arguing with me only reinforces the fact that you view me as a threat. Ken Scott kept telling you the same thing. At some point, you claimed he was my buddy when I never met this Ken Scott. You are delirious and like to play the blaming game.

Eventually, what I say in different words is repeated by you in other words. The information we both provide is the same. Our common objective is to help. I do it without asking money, you make a living out of this.

Now stop being delirious. Those fake profiles may have been a ploy to once again reinforce the idea that you are an expert. When the experiment went down south, you claimed I was the one behind it. Genius. Notice how you used my username as well.

I am starting to think that you have very bad intentions. You are not someone I wish to meet and we are just turning around in circles.

I will once again wish you a happy weekend. Don't expect another response and I know you will try your hardest to make me look like a fool again. We have become accustomed to your silly games and antics.

nicknack

thanks John and Hats. Do you guys think it'll be worthwhile checking with the courthouses to make sure there is no file kept on me once I get a pardon? I read that CBP can access court databases, is that so?

Mr. Fantastic

@NickNack

Once you are fingerprinted by police for a aaud crime, the information is kept in 3 databases, the municipal or provincial court (each province has their own rules), the arresting police force and CPIC, the national database.

CBP doesn't have access to court databases. However, they could if they wished too. They don't really have the time to file a request unless you are a fugitive fleeing across the border and they stop you. The information can take a long time to be given to US authorities.

CBP has access to several other databases such as APIS (the no flight list), gang members database and Interpol. This information is shared between most countries.

Once you get a pardon, you can request for the courthouse to destroy the information they have on you depending on the province.

There is an online database known as CanLi which makes all court cases visible to the public.

Michelle (trusted member) Trusted

#NickNack, the Court Houses follow their own retention files for original documents. However, keep in mind that since 1992, most files are on a computer system and information is not removed from there. Also there was reference to CanLi..which does show some court cases..Not all. Another thing people need to keep in mind that USA Customs will access is the Internet. If your case was interesting enough, there maybe a historical news article somewhere on Google. These are extremely difficult to remove. No one knows what access USA Customs has, but I would assume if they want to know about you..they will find out.

Reply

Formatting: **bold**, *italic*, > quote, - list, [link text](https://…)

No email, no registration. Pick a name and a password, write them down, and use the same pair every time. Forgot your password?